Newsgroups: lter.ced
Path: LTERnet!root
From: "Bruce P. Hayden" <bph@envsci.evsc.virginia.edu>
Subject: CED 2.7 
Message-ID: <1993Jun30.185830.29449@lternet.washington.edu>
Sender: root@lternet.washington.edu (Operator)
Organization: Long Term Ecological Research
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1993 17:54:52 GMT

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***      ***********       ***********       **********       ***
     ***     *                  *                 *         *      ***
     ***     *                  *                 *          *     ***
     ***     *                  *                 *          *     ***
     ***     *                  *********         *          *     ***
     ***     *                  *                 *          *     ***
     ***     *                  *                 *          *     ***
     ***     *                  *                 *          *     ***
     ***     *                  *                 *         *      ***
     ***      ***********       ***********       **********       ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************

         Vol.2  No.7 :::::: file name:CED2.7 :::::: July 1, 1993

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************

CED METADATA ---- CED is the Climate/Ecosystem Dynamics bulletin board of
the LTER network. In CED, you will find exchanges of ideas, information,
data,
bibliographies,literature discussions, and a place to find experts within
the LTER community.  We are interested in both climate controls on
ecosystems 
and ecosystem controls on climate.  As this is an inter-disciplinary
activity,
we hope to provide things that you might not come across in your work at
your LTER site.

CED is a product of the LTER climate committee and contributions to CED for
general e-mail release may be sent to either David Greenland of Andrews
LTER [Greenlan@oregon.uoregon.edu] or to Bruce Hayden of the Virginia Coast
Reserve LTER [bph@envsci.evsc.virginia.edu].  We expect that the scope of
CED will evolve and reflect the interests of the contributors and users of
this service.  CED will be issued as the preparation work gets done
(usually monthly).  Back-issus of CED may be requested from Daniel Pommert
[daniel@lternet.washington.edu] by the file name given in the masthead. 
Daniel can also add people to the CED mailing list.   

Feedback on CED from LTER scientists is welcome (non-$$$$ contributions
also welcome.)  For example, please forward citations of climate &
ecosystem publications on your site.  We are keeping a LTER wide
bibliography
on Climate/Ecosystem Dynamics that we pass on via E-mail. 

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                    YMCA OF THE ROCKIES                    ***
     ***                     EL NINO WORKSHOP                      ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************



LTER El Nino lovers will hold a workshop in Estes Park at the 1993 edition
of the All Scientists Meeting this September (watch your e-mail for entry
forms or you may pester your site data manager for the same).  We will
network the old fashioned, non-electronic but still eclectic way; we will
facilitate shy people in talking to each another; and, we will promote,
foster and encourage new work (perhaps a proposal) on El Nino and its
ecosystem connections.   All All-Scientists are welcome.  If you have
something to contribute and want a few minutes at the head table please let
me know.  In the last CED I sent out to two EL Nino Indexes.  In this issue
you will find an index of strength of the Southern Oscillation.  With a
little luck on everyone's part it will spur you on to look for an El Nino
signal at your site.  Even if you have only a small contribution, perhaps
an overhead with a pregnant graph of a possible El Nino-LTER site
connection bring it along.   We can discuss it.  Watch for details and
supplemental information in the next two CEDs.

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                        SOI INDEX                          ***
     ***                    BY YEAR AND MONTH                      ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************

The SOI Index is the difference in mean monthly pressures in mb between
Darwin, Australia and Tahiti in the South Pacific.  Missing data are
indicated by a dot.

Year	Jan	feb	mar	apr	may	jun	jul	aug	sept	oct	nov	dec	ann
1882	-1	-0.3	0.4	0	0.5	-1.2	-2.1	-2.8	-1.7	0	0.1	1	-0.59
1883	0.8	-1.3	-3.2	1.1	1.1	0.2	-1.2	0	-1	0.3	0.2	-2.2	-0.43
1884	-1.7	-1	0.9	-1	0.1	0.7	-0.4	-0.7	-0.7	0.3	-0.2	-1.8	-0.46
1885	-2.2	0	0.6	0	-0.2	-1.2	-0.4	-1.1	-0.4	-2	-1.6	0.6	-0.66
1886	-0.2	-0.1	0.3	0.2	0.6	0.2	0.7	1.2	1.4	1.3	0.8	1.6	0.667
1887	1.6	1.2	1	0.6	-0.4	0.3	0.4	0.3	0.6	0.5	-0.6	0.6	0.508
1888	-0.6	-0.3	-1.4	-1.8	-0.8	-1.3	-1.6	-1	-1.1	-1.5	-1.4	-0.4	-1.1
1889	-3.5	-0.3	-3.4	0	-0.1	1.7	0.1	0	1.1	0.2	1.9	2.5	0.017
1890	2.6	1.4	1.5	0.6	0.3	0.4	-0.4	-0.5	0.8	0.3	0	-0.1	0.575
1891	2.1	-0.7	-1.3	0.4	0	-0.1	-0.6	-0.8	-1	0	-0.6	-0.7	-0.28
1892	0.2	-1.5	1.2	0.6	0.9	1.4	0.8	0.4	%	%	%	%	%
1893	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%
1894	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%
1895	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%
1896	0.7	1.1	-0.3	-0.1	-2.6	-2	-1.5	-1.6	-1.5	-1.4	-0.6	-1.3	-0.93
1897	-1.6	-1.1	-2.1	-1.4	-1.5	-0.2	-0.1	0.1	0	0.1	-0.9	1.1	-0.63
1898	0.9	0.6	2	0.8	-0.1	-0.3	0.6	0.7	1	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.575
1899	1.6	1	1.4	0.2	-0.5	-0.8	-0.6	-1.1	-0.2	0.6	1.4	-0.5	0.208
1900	-1	-1	-3.2	-1.4	-0.6	1.9	1	0.6	-1.8	-2	-0.7	-0.8	-0.75
1901	-0.2	0.3	1	0.4	0	1.4	1.4	0.9	-1.7	-2.5	-1	-0.3	-0.03
1902	2.2	-0.4	1.3	0.6	0.8	0.2	0.1	-1	-1.9	-0.9	-0.5	-0.4	0.008
1903	-1.3	-1.6	1.8	1.4	0.8	-0.1	0.4	-0.1	0.9	0.4	0	1.8	0.367
1904	1.8	2	1	2.4	0.7	-0.7	-1	-0.1	0.1	-0.1	-1.8	0.1	0.367
1905	-1.2	-2.5	-3.6	-3.3	-3	-2.5	-2	-1	-0.7	-0.8	-1.9	-1.9	-2.03
1906	-0.6	-1.2	%	%	%	-0.4	0.5	1.4	1.9	0.8	1.9	%	%
1907	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%
1908	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	2	0.7	0.1	-0.8	%
1909	-0.3	-0.4	-0.3	-1.1	0.1	1.6	1	0.8	0	0.2	0.6	0.5	0.225
1910	0.6	1.9	1.3	0.3	0.1	1.7	2	0.9	1.5	0.9	1.7	1.9	1.233
1911	0.2	0.1	0.3	0	-0.6	-1.1	-1.3	-1.3	-0.9	-1.4	-0.9	-0.4	-0.61
1912	-1.4	-2.4	-1.2	-1.7	-1	-0.6	-0.2	-1	-0.5	-0.8	0.1	-1.2	-0.99
1913	-0.5	-0.8	-0.1	-0.6	-0.6	-0.5	-0.2	-1	-1.1	-1.1	-1.2	-1	-0.73
1914	-0.7	0.2	1	%	%	%	%	%	%	-0.9	%	%	%
1915	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	-1.6	1	%
1916	0.6	-0.6	-1	0	0.4	0.6	2.4	1.4	0.4	0.5	0.8	1.6	0.592
1917	0.6	1.4	1.9	1.7	1.8	1.6	2.6	3.3	3.2	1.5	1.9	2.6	2.008
1918	1.8	2.1	-0.4	1.4	0.9	-0.4	-1.5	-0.6	-0.8	-0.6	-0.1	-1.1	0.058
1919	-2.2	-1.6	-1.7	-0.2	-0.7	-0.9	-0.9	-0.9	-0.5	-1.2	-1.2	-1.3	-1.11
1920	0.1	-0.5	-0.7	-0.1	-0.2	0.3	0.8	0.3	0.6	-0.6	-0.1	1	0.075
1921	1.5	0.7	%	%	%	%	0.2	-0.8	0.4	1	0.6	0.8	%
1922	0.9	1	0.5	-0.4	-0.5	0.2	0.1	-0.3	0.5	0.5	0.7	1.2	0.367
1923	0.6	0.4	0.9	0.6	0.1	-0.2	-1.2	-2	-1.6	-0.7	-1.4	0.2	-0.36
1924	-0.7	0	0.2	-1.2	0.9	0.5	0.7	1	0.8	0.7	1	0.4	0.358
1925	0.6	1.8	1.5	1	-0.1	-0.5	-1.4	-1.2	-0.6	-1.5	-1.1	-1.2	-0.23
1926	-1.9	-3.1	-2.7	-1.6	-1.2	-1.7	-1.2	-2	-0.9	-0.8	-1.1	-0.5	-1.56
1927	0.5	-0.1	2	0.6	0.5	%	%	%	0	-0.6	-0.9	0.8	%
1928	-1.3	1.3	1.4	1	-0.2	-0.7	0	0.9	1	0.9	0.1	1.4	0.483
1929	1.9	2.3	0.5	0.3	-1	0.1	0.3	-0.1	-0.1	0.7	1	0.6	0.542
1930	1.5	0.8	0	-0.2	0.1	-0.6	-0.5	-0.4	-0.7	0.4	0.1	-0.4	0.008
1931	0.9	-2	0.5	0.7	1.2	1.3	0.9	%	%	%	%	%	%
1932	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	-1.1	-0.6	-0.6	0.2	%
1933	-1.6	0.4	-0.4	0.3	0.5	-0.4	0.2	-0.2	0.3	0.2	0.5	0.9	0.209
1934	0.7	0	-0.1	0.4	-0.5	0.8	0.2	-2.5	-0.7	0.3	1.1	-0.4	-0.06
1935	0.8	-0.7	1.3	0.3	-0.4	-0.2	0	0.1	0.6	0.7	0.2	-0.6	0.175
1936	-0.3	-0.1	0	0.5	0.4	-0.3	0.3	-1	0.2	-0.1	-1.5	-0.1	-0.17
1937	1.1	-0.8	0.6	0.1	-0.1	0.1	-0.5	0.1	0.1	-0.5	-0.5	0.6	0.025
1938	0.8	0.4	-0.5	0.3	1	1.3	1.8	1	0.9	1.3	0	1.6	0.825
1939	2.1	0.8	1.1	0.7	-0.1	-0.2	0.8	-0.3	-1.1	-1.7	-1	-1.2	-0.01
1940	-0.1	-0.8	-1.3	-0.7	-1.2	-1.7	-1.6	-1.9	-2	-1.9	-0.9	-2.6	-1.39
1941	-1.4	-2.2	-1.4	-0.9	-0.6	-1.2	-2	-2	-0.9	-2.2	-1.1	-1.2	-1.43
1942	-1.8	-0.7	-0.8	-0.4	0.4	0.5	-0.2	0.2	0.9	0.7	-0.6	1.6	-0.02
1943	1.2	1.2	0.3	1	0.2	-0.7	0.2	0.6	0.5	0.8	0.2	-1.2	0.358
1944	-1.2	0.4	0.5	-0.4	-0.1	-0.4	-0.9	0.2	0.3	-1	-0.8	0.3	-0.26
1945	0.6	0.7	1.4	-0.5	0	0.5	0.3	1	0.9	0.1	-0.5	0.7	0.433
1946	-0.4	0.4	-0.4	-0.7	-0.9	-0.9	-1.1	-0.6	-1.8	-1.4	-0.3	-0.9	-0.75
1947	-0.7	-0.8	1.2	-0.4	-1.1	0.1	0.9	0.5	1.2	-0.3	0.7	0.5	0.15
1948	-0.5	-0.5	-0.7	0.2	0.3	-0.5	0	-0.6	-0.9	0.5	0.2	-0.9	-0.28
1949	-1.1	0.1	0.5	0.1	-0.5	-1	-0.2	-0.6	0.2	0.4	-0.8	0.7	-0.18
1950	0.5	2.1	1.9	1.2	0.6	2	2	1.1	0.7	1.6	1	2.7	1.45
1951	1.7	0.6	-0.8	-0.6	-1	-0.3	-1.4	-0.7	-1.3	-1.4	-1	-1	-0.6
1952	-1.2	-1.1	0	-0.5	0.6	0.5	0.4	-0.4	-0.3	0.2	-0.2	-1.6	-0.3
1953	0.2	-1	-0.8	-0.1	-2.2	-0.3	-0.1	-1.9	-1.5	-0.2	-0.4	-0.7	-0.75
1954	0.6	-0.7	-0.3	0.4	0.3	-0.3	0.3	0.8	0.2	0.1	0.1	1.5	0.25
1955	-0.7	1.8	0.1	-0.5	0.9	1.1	1.7	1.2	1.5	1.5	1.3	1	0.908
1956	1.4	1.5	0.9	0.7	1.3	0.8	1.1	0.9	0	1.9	0.1	1	0.967
1957	0.6	-0.5	-0.4	0	-1	-0.2	0.1	-1	-1.1	-0.2	-1.2	-0.5	-0.45
1958	-2.3	-1	-0.3	0.1	-0.9	-0.2	0.3	0.6	-0.4	-0.2	-0.6	-0.9	-0.48
1959	-1.2	-2	0.9	0.2	0.3	-0.6	-0.5	-0.6	0	0.3	1	0.8	-0.12
1960	0	-0.3	0.6	0.6	0.3	-0.3	0.4	0.5	0.7	-0.1	0.5	0.8	0.308
1961	-0.4	0.7	-2.7	0.7	0.1	-0.3	0.1	-0.2	0.1	-0.7	0.6	1.6	-0.03
1962	2.2	-0.7	-0.4	0	1	0.4	-0.1	0.3	0.5	0.9	0.3	0	0.367
1963	1.1	0.4	0.7	0.6	0.1	-1	-0.3	-0.5	-0.7	-1.6	-1	-1.6	-0.32
1964	-0.5	-0.3	0.7	1	-0.1	0.4	0.4	1.3	1.4	1.3	0	-0.5	0.425
1965	-0.6	0.1	0.2	-0.8	-0.1	-1	-2.2	-1.2	-1.5	-1.2	-1.8	0	-0.84
1966	-1.7	-0.7	-1.7	-0.5	-0.7	0	-0.1	0.3	-0.3	-0.4	-0.1	-0.6	-0.54
1967	1.9	1.6	0.8	-0.3	-0.3	0.3	0	0.5	0.6	-0.2	-0.6	-0.8	0.292
1968	0.4	1.1	-0.5	-0.2	1.1	0.9	0.6	-0.1	-0.3	-0.3	-0.5	0	0.183
1969	-2	-1.1	-0.1	-0.6	-0.6	-0.2	-0.7	-0.6	-1.2	-1.3	-0.2	0.3	-0.69
1970	-1.4	-1.6	0	-0.4	0.1	0.7	-0.6	0.2	1.3	0.9	1.7	2.1	0.25
1971	0.3	1.9	2.1	1.7	0.7	0.1	0.1	1.3	1.6	1.7	0.5	0	1
1972	0.4	0.8	0.1	-0.4	-2.1	-1.1	-1.9	-1	-1.6	-1.2	-0.5	-1.6	-0.84
1973	-0.5	-2	0.2	-0.2	0.2	0.8	0.5	1.1	1.4	0.6	2.9	2	0.583
1974	2.7	2	2.2	0.8	0.9	0.1	1.2	0.5	1.3	0.8	-0.3	0	1.017
1975	-0.8	0.6	1.2	1.1	0.5	1.1	2.1	1.9	2.4	1.7	1.3	2.3	1.283
1976	1.5	1.6	1.3	0.1	0.2	-0.1	-1.2	-1.3	-1.4	0.2	0.7	-0.6	0.083
1977	-0.7	1.1	-1.3	-0.8	-0.9	-1.5	-1.5	-1.3	-1	-1.4	-1.6	-1.4	-1.03
1978	-0.4	-3.5	-0.8	-0.6	1.3	0.3	0.4	0	0	-0.7	-0.1	-0.3	-0.37
1979	-0.7	0.8	-0.5	-0.4	0.3	0.4	1.3	-0.6	0.1	-0.4	-0.6	-1	-0.11
1980	0.3	0	-1.2	-1	-0.3	-0.4	-0.2	0	-0.6	-0.3	-0.5	-0.3	-0.38
1981	0.2	-0.6	-2.1	-0.4	0.7	1	0.8	0.4	0.4	-0.7	0.1	0.5	0.025
1982	1.3	-0.1	0.1	-0.2	-0.7	-1.6	-1.9	-2.5	-2	-2.2	-3.2	-2.8	-1.32
1983	-4.2	-4.6	-3.4	-1.3	0.5	-0.3	-0.8	-0.2	1	0.3	-0.2	-0.1	-1.11
1984	0.1	0.6	-0.9	0.2	0	-0.8	0	0	0.1	-0.6	0.2	-0.4	-0.13
1985	-0.5	1	0.2	1	0.2	-0.9	-0.3	0.7	0	-0.7	-0.3	0.1	0.042
1986	0.9	-1.6	0	0.1	-0.5	0.7	0.1	-0.1	-0.6	0.5	-1.5	-1.8	-0.32
1987	-0.9	-1.9	-2	-1.9	-1.7	-1.7	-1.7	-1.5	-1.2	-0.7	-0.1	-0.7	-1.33
1988	-0.2	-0.9	0.1	-0.1	0.8	-0.2	1.1	1.4	2.1	1.4	1.9	1.3	0.725
1989	1.7	1.1	0.6	1.6	1.2	0.5	0.8	-0.8	0.6	0.6	-0.4	-0.7	0.567
1990	-0.2	-2.4	-1.2	0	1.1	0	0.5	-0.6	-0.8	0.1	-0.7	-0.5	-0.39
1991	0.6	-0.1	-1.4	-1	-1.5	-0.5	-0.2	-0.9	-1.8	-1.5	-0.8	-2.3	-0.95
1992	-3.4	-1.4	-3	-1.4	0	-1.2	-0.8	0	0	-1.9	-0.9	-0.9	-1.24
1993	-1.3	-2.3	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%	%


     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                         EL NINO                           ***
     ***                            &                              ***
     ***               THE CONSENTING CLIMATOLOGIST                ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************


In the winter of 1982-1983 the collective-we experienced one of the
strongest El Nino events of record.  All round the world weather that
seemed locally strange was deemed "caused" by the El Nino.  News was made
everywhere.  Little matter that the sample size (N) was 1.0!  My favorite
El Nino curse of that great global event was the single case of a bubonic
plague "victim" in California that was blamed on the El Nino.  Southern
California was wetter than normal that winter and the ground squirrels had
a splendid year.  They were fruitful and multiplied.  The resident flea of
the ground squirrel also had a great year, I guess.  Then one of those
fleas laden with Yersina pestis found its unlucky victim.  The rest is
history.  News was made.  What fun we had that year.  Card-carrying
climatologists chuckled at the trench-coated reporters and the worried
anchormen.  Climatology had made it big.  That year climate made both the
National Inquirer and the New York Times.  That is old hats now.  We had 
thought that a climatological N was 30 years or so.  We were liberated. N
just didn't matter any more.  We could think free.  Cause and effect hasn't
been the same since.   It was the year that was in Climatology.  
Long-term, big-N, climate-ecosystem studies have since proved the reality
important connections between El Nino dynamics and ecosystem behavior at
many places greatly distant from the shore of Peru.    

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                EARLY HISTORY OF THE EL NINO                ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************


Credit for the El Nino goes locally  to Peruvian Dr. Luis Scarranza, one
time president of the Lima Geographic Society, and globally to Sir Gilbert
Walker.  The Brits sent some their best, in this case Walker, to the far
East and to the far West.  You can do that when you are perched on the
prime meridian at Greenwich.  By the way, the English are trying to find a
buyer for the observatory at Greenwich.  Privatization marches on. [Aside:
Ms Thatcher has become the titular head of the College of Willima & Mary at
Williamsburg, Virginia.  We have long benefited from workers from the
motherland.]   Sir Gilbert proposed that there was a great atmospheric
oscillation between the South Pacific and the Indian Ocean.  He called it
the Southern Oscillation (see data set above).  When pressure was higher
than normal in the South Pacific (Tahiti) it was lower than normal in the
Indian Ocean (Darwin) and visa versa.  The Southern Oscillation was found
to be linked in time to a phenomena on the West Coast of South America
called El Nino.  We climatologists now boldly refer to the two events as
one: ENSO (El Nino-Southern Oscillation).  

Sir Gilbert also published his conclusion that there as a circum-equatorial
circulation with rising motions over equatorial Africa, equatorial South
America and the maritime continent (Indonesia and the many islands
immediately to the East) and sinking motions in between.  In the 1960s,
this circumequatorial circulation was named the Walker Circulation.  When I
was taking my meteorological training in 1960s the Walker Circulation was
to meteorology what George's voodoo was to Reganomics.  Well, all the
modern much-to-do about ENSO has rendered Sir Gilbert to the pantheon of
mentionables in the history of meteorology.  Sir Gilbert is in our
good-graces now.  Prior to this time, periodic and quasi-periodic variation
in the atmosphere was restricted to the 24 hour cycle, the 365 day cycle
and a hard won but soft belief in the Milankovitch cycles associated with
the ice ages.  The meteorologists could find little in between that made a
difference.  The El Nino, once it earned its way to the
suitable-for-funding-class of attention-getters, fit in in-between these
high and low frequency variations.  These were heady days.  Perhaps
forecasts of some climate attributes could be predicted as much as a year
ahead of time if ... if there was a way to predict when the next great ENSO
would happen!

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***        EL NINO, WALKER & THE SOUTHERN OSCILLATION         ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************


Near the end of each calendar year, along the coasts of Ecuador and Peru,
the coastal currents reverse.  Southward flow along the coast replaces
northward flow.  Warm water replaces cold water.  A chance of rain along
the coastal deserts replaces little or no chance.  Locals noted this annual
happening during the Christmas season and called it "The Child"; in Spanish
El Nino.  This is the generic El Nino.  It is an annual event.  Every
several years the warming is much greater in extent than its annual
siblings but still is linked in time to the end of the calendar year.  This
is what we now call El Nino.  Years without this big event are called La
Nina. It is now widely held that El Nino has a global climate signature.  

It is the Christmas season that coincides with falling pressures in the
Pacific (Tahiti) that is a candidate year for a major, non-generic El Nino.
 The period of the generic El Nino is 1 year.  The period of the southern
Oscillation is between 3 and 4 years and great El Ninos somewhere around,
about or near every 7 years or so but not very constant and not really
periodic and so prediction is not a given.  

When the El Nino is in effect deep convection of the atmosphere along the
tropical Pacific is shifted from Indonesia to near the Dateline.  This area
of deep convection is part of a circumequatorial mode of atmospheric
circulation called the Walker Circulation.  The Walker Circulation is named
(by Jacob Bjerknes M.W.R. 97:163-172)  after Sir Gilbert Walker.  The
Walker circulation is a circumequatorial set of atmospheric motions with
vertical motions in three regions.  Heating over equatorial Africa,
equatorial South America and over the maritime continent to the north of
Queensland.  Sinking motions are found between these regions of upward
motions.  In non-El Nino years the Equatorial Pacific Ocean center of
upward motions is over the maritime continent around 150 degrees East
Meridian.  The more intense the El Nino the further east is this limb of
the Walker Circulation.  During an El Nino this center of convection is
near the Dateline (180 E).   

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                      DATELINE 180 E & 180 W               ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************


In El Nino years the Pacific ascending branch of the Walker Circulation is
positioned near the International Dateline rather than over Indonesia. 
Vast quantities of water are lifted into the atmosphere.  The fate of this
flux of water vapor is upward, northward and eastward.  [A film clip of
this will be shown at the El Nino workshop in Estes Park.] This river of
moist air, when present heads toward North America, crosses the western
littoral over Baja California and turns eastward across Arizona, New Mexico
and the U.S. Gulf Coast.  Especially in the spring we see higher
probabilities of rainfalls and higher total rainfalls.  As far East as Key
West (1835-1991) the El Nino gives rise to this spring time raininess.  The
best documented area for these spring rains is the American Southwest. 
Cliff Dahm and Manuel Molles (Sevilleta LTER) found that spring runoff was
6.0 to 7.4 times higher in El Nino years than in non-El Nino years.  These
increases resulted from a 2.1  to 2.8 increase in precipitation.  In the
American Southwest both rainfall events and the supply of atmospheric
moisture for the rain can both be traced to events in the equatorial
Pacific Ocean.  

See: Molles, M.C. and C. N. Dahm (1990). J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc.
9(1):68-76. &  Molles, M.C. and C. N. Dahm and M. T. Crocker (1992). In
Aquatic Ecosystems in Semi-Arid Regions: Implications for Resource
Management. R. D. Robarts and M. L. Bothwell (Eds.).  NHRI Symposium Series
7, Environment Canada, Saskatoon. p. 197-202. & C. N. Dahm (1992). Stream
in Semiarid Regions as Sensitive Indicators of Global Change.  Ch. 12 in
Global Warming and Freshwater Ecosystems. P. firth and S. G. Fisher (Eds.)
Springer Verlag. p. 250-260.

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                   QUINN KEEPS THE FAITH                   ***
     ***                      from Cliff Dahm                      ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************


Bill Quinn. served as my surrogate major professor when my advisor at
Oregon State University, Kilho Park, left to work at NOAA. I see him
occasionally and try to keep in touch via letter and phone. He is of the
old school of science and e-mail, supercomputers, etc. aren't part of his
toolkit.

Bill became interested in the tropical Pacific during World War II. He was
a weather analyst and forecaster in Africa, the Middle East, and Europe. 
After the war he was assigned the position of chief climatologist based in
Tokyo with responsibility for the Pacific and Far East. After the war he
had added a M.S. degree in oceanography from Scripps to go along with his
A.M. in geology and meteorology. He stayed active in the military until
1965 when he began his Ph.D. work at Oregon State University. His post-war
military assignments included such interesting posts as stints at Cape
Canaveral and meteorological support to the Presidential aircraft from
62-64.

His research has always focused on the ENSO phenomenon. I vividly remember
the first seminar of his I heard in the late seventies where he showed a
strong correlation between the price of chickens in the U.S. and El Nino
events. There was something a poor graduate student  could relate to.
Chicken feed was largely supplied by the fishery off the west coast of
South America. he was already toying with ideas for  predicting El Nino
events based on a number of oceanographic and meteorological
characteristics.

Bill's most significant paper is probably the 450 year record of El Nino
occurrences published in JGR. The paper was 10 years in the making. It
involved translations of historical documents from five different
languages. It is an impressive scholarly compilation. More recently, he has
used the Nile River to extend his historical  reconstruction back to 622
AD. He once told me that David of Biblical fame was a Nile-ometer reader
for the pharaoh of Egypt and was therefore of great value. The record of
the stage height of the Nile during flood stage goes back almost 4
millennia BC although the record is not continuous. Wars and stuff kept
causing gaps so he only went back to 622 AD his latest paper in the Diaz
and Markgraf book.

I lied about his age in my earlier note. Bill turns 75 September 28. He is
a remarkable man with a steely dedication to his area of science. I think
he is rather enjoying the fact that there is now so much interest in the
ENSO phenomenon. He remembers a time when only the people in western South
America were really interested in what he did. 

QUINN-BIB: 
Quinn, W. H., D. O. Zoph, K. S. Short, and R. T. W. Kuo Yang.  (1978).
Historical trends and statistics of the Southern Oscillation, El Nino, and
Indonesian droughts.  Fish. Bull. 76:663-678.
Quinn, W. H. (1972).  Use of the Southern Oscillation in weather
prediction.  J. Appl. Meteorol. 11:616-628.
Quinn, W. H. (1974).  Monitoring and predicting El Nino invasions.  J.
Appl. Meteorol. 13:825-830.
Quinn, W. H., V. T. Neal, and S. E. Antunez de Mayolo. (1987). El Nino over
the past four and a half centuries. J. G. R.  92:14449-14461.
Quinn, W. H. (1992). A study of Southern Oscillation-related climatic
activity for A.D. 622-1990 incorporating Nile River flood data. In Diaz, H.
F. and Markgraf, V. (eds.), El Nino: Historical and paleoclimatic Aspects
of the Southern Oscillation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 293 pp.


     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***               ANCHOVIES, SOYBEANS AND CASHEWS             ***
     ***                                                           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************


You are what you eat!  This is almost a pre-New Age, New Age article of
faith.  Tell it to the chickens.  For some decades anchovies have been
chicken food.  Somehow chickens eat anchovies and don't taste like it. 
Don't cash-in your quartz- crystal-in-distilled-water-amulet just yet. 
When El Nino gets bad with warm waters off Peru, the anchovies are
elsewhere and you can't get them on the commercial conveyer belt to the
chickens.  Chickens got to eat so you feed them something else.  In the
U.S., our El Nino chicken feed is soybean meal.  When the anchovies are not
schooling along the Peruvian Coast our chickens eat soybean meal.  With
this extra demand, the soybeans cost more and fortunes are made in the
commodities markets.  Tofu costs more.  Archer-Daniels-Midlands has a
bigger cash flow.  In Europe, when the El Nino deprives Euro-chickens of
anchovies, the Euro-chicken eat cashews!  Now, what I would like to know is
why chicken is so cheap (sub-$ per lb) and yet they eat such expensive
foods.  You can't get anchovies and cashews for peanuts you know!   I often
thought that in order to wring dollars out of our pockets by selling
expensive anchovies and cashews it was necessary to get rid anchovies and
cashews in the fit-for-human-consumption market.  Supply and Demand you
know.  
  

     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************
     ***                                                           ***
     ***              JUST ONE NON-EL NINO CONTRIBUTION            ***
     ***                            aka                            ***
     ***             CLIMATE, LIBERALISM AND INTOLERANCE           ***
     ***                                                           ***
     *****************************************************************
     *****************************************************************


I better start-off with the literature citation on this one. R. A. Beck
(1993). Climate, Liberalism and Intolerance. Weather 48:63-64.

For a long time now climatologists, from time to time, have slipped off the
slippery slope of environmental determinism.  Yale's Ellisworth Huntington
in the 1930s took the biggest plunge of record.  He could have won ABC
"agony of defeat" award.  Well there is a new, sort of self-nominated
candidate.  Self-nomination comes in the form of an article published in
the British journal, Weather.  If you think what follows is sort of
self-praise in a nationalistic way -- well, right on.  

Beck's hypothesis is also his topic sentence in his paragraph 2: "Consider
several cases of liberal tendencies in areas in mid-latitudes which have
equable climate."  To prove his point he creates a TD index.  TD is the
difference in the temperatures (C) of the hottest and coldest month.  The
lower the TD the more liberal a people are!  Britain scores a very liberal
12!  One nice pat on the back for Beck's fellow citizens.  He notes how
little support Fascism  got in England and how they have become a
multiracial society.  He goes on to note that the greatest support for the
Liberal Democrat Party came from the low TD areas of southwest England,
western Scotland and the Scottish islands.  He also notes that Laws of
Jewish emancipation were written in countries with TDs in the 10 to 15 C
range.  Beck notes that Franco's homeland has a TD of 20!  He praises New
Zealand with its TD of 10; says nothing about Australia (it was the place
for Beck's Liberal England dumped its convicts); and, has a liberal lust
for San Francisco with it TD of 6!  He notes the San Francisco is the "home
of America's radical fringe."  His list of places with intolerant acts
include: Spain, Germany, Italy and Austria in the TD 20s; U. S. states with
capital punishment have TDs in the 20s; and, the Mongol "wreakers of havoc"
with a TD of 30!  Clearly, it not the fault of the Khans, their environment
made them do it. Peking has a TD of 31 and most of China has TDs in 20s.  

Beck notes that the TD versus liberalism rule has shortcomings in the low
latitudes, i.e. it does not work.  TDs are very low in equatorial regions. 
Samoza, Baby Doc, Idi and many other lovables come from places that put San
Francisco to shame for its high TD of 6!  Bob Waide's LTER site would score
a nice 4.7 on the TD scaled.  Luquillo is our most liberal LTER site. We
all know that.  Our Attila the Hun (406?-453 AD) award goes to Bonanza
Creek but to no PI in particular.  They are all sweetie-pies in the CED
book.

LIBERALISM INDEX FOR LTER SITES

ANDREWS			18.0
ARCTIC TUNDRA		31.0
BONANAZA CREEK	42.0* OH, MY!
CEDAR CREEK		34.6
CPR				24.7 In the Franco range.
COWEET			18.5
DRY VALLEY		???? but a nice bunch people
HARVARD FOREST	27.0*
HUBBARAD BROOK	27.0*
JORNADA			22.0
KELLOGG			24.0*
KONZA			29.3
LUQUILLO			  4.7* WOW!
NIWOT			21.5
NORTH INLET		18.5
NTL				31.6
PALMER			17.0*
SEVILLETA		22.0*
VCR				21.3
________________________________________________
* = eyeballed from Long-term Ecological Research in the United States: A
Network of Research Sites. (1991)  Sixth Edition Revised.  LTER Publication
No. 1.  Network Office, Seattle, Washington.

I have not taken the time to attach the Lead PI to this table.  CED readers
are quite capable of penciling in the names.  I can't resist to ponder the
fate of liberalism and global warming.  IN a 2XCO2 world Winter
temperatures get a lot warmer and the Summer temperatures just a fractdion
warmer. That means that the TD index gets smaller!  We will become more
liberal as and if CO2 has its  modeled effect.  

----------------+--------------------------------+-------------------------
Bruce P. Hayden |  Dept. Environmental Sciences  |  bph@virginia.EDU
(804) 924-0545  |  Clark Hall, Univ. of Virginia |  bph@virginia.BITNET
(804) 924-7761  |  Charlottesville, VA 22903     |  (804) 982-2137(fax) 
----------------+--------------------------------+-------------------------

